 |
| Home |Mathematics and Fly Fishing
The Rod Tip
|
It follows from the calculations of the moments that
the moment at the tip is zero. The moment increases as we
move down the rod.
The implication of the small diameter near the tip is
that the theoretical diameters required to match the
stress level for the middle and the lower parts of the
rod are so small that the tip becomes mechanical fragile.
So we have to increase the diameter to make the tip
mechanical manageable. But this is not always enough.
The tip may be flimsy and give unwanted waves in the
line. So we have to increase further to get rid if we
want to get rid of the waves.
The waves are not too decremental to the action and it
is more a matter of learning to cast with a very soft
tip.
Fighting even a small fish on a rod with a very soft
tip is a lot of fun - until it hits into the weeds.
The very soft tip does not offer any advantage as far
as protecting the leader tip. It is the overall stiffness
of the rod that determines the buffer action. When a
hooked fish loads the rod, the angle between the first
10" of the tip and the line is small, and there is
not much buffer action to be had from the tip.
Garrisons approach was to calculate the rods for a
constant stress, and then make corrections to the tip
section, if needed.
We may wonder why Garrison bothered to calculate the
stress at the point 1". A better approach would be
to define the diameter at the top eye. It has the
additional advantage, that the rod mass between the top
eye and the 1" point will be included in the
calculation.
Calculating for uniform stress at a high load will
therefore give very small diameters at the tip. Resulting
in a flimsy tip. The section area is adequate with regard
to the bending stress; but mechanical will be very
fragile.
The stress reduction must be found by experience, but we
may get some clues by looking at Garrison's rods. See About the programs for a suggestion.
When using other stress profiles, you are on your own.
Conclusion:
There is a theoretical reason for the reduction of
stresses near the tip.
A short rod may not need the stress reduction, unless it
is very soft, whereas a long rod always will.
Warning.
On the Garrison stress curves drawn with three tips, the
light tip may be too soft and give some waves on the
line.
The Modulus of Elasticity
This page was modified August 11, 2001
Copyright © 1998,
Falka Gregersen. All rights
reserved.
|